Friday, November 17, 2017

We STILL Haven't Learned - Eh, We Haven't for Millennia...

There's a conflagration now about the most proper sexual morality in light of the fact that just about everyone who's anyone is being exposed for their rank immorality. Okay maybe NOW we'll get the right idea about the right way to be righteous with our genitals.


Two of the very best pieces in the panoply of punditry these days about it all are this one from John Hawkins and this one from Matt Walsh. I can't find any that are better.

There are a few really important things though that they don't say, and absolutely no one is saying these things. At least not that I've seen. Wow I'd sure like to see more of these things in the mainstream, but well, The Catholicist Nation perspective is a bit eccentric, so, no matter, never mind, whatever...

That first one from Hawkins gets right smack at the truth about sexually charged behavior, and there is pretty much an unspoken truth in there just so graphically elucidated by Hawkins. We are all captivated by things related to sex and death. This is not revelatory by any means, but it is largely unspoken and unaddressed especially in light of all this. How best to get even farther beyond the truths Hawkins cites? Well, he doesn't say.

Then Walsh does his typical masterful job of getting at the core meaning of things. It is true: how about trying a bit of restraint, modesty, and chastity? Thing is that stuff's been around for eons too, but to Walsh's credit there are times -- like the period of the last 40 years or so -- when to consider those things seriously was to be Victorian, Puritan, prudish, and all the rest of that unsavoriness. So how about trying it now? Problem there is, how do you get there without the abject misery of chastity for chastity's sake? Hmm, Walsh doesn't say either.

One of the things they don't get into but I'm sure some have is that all this sexual morality police stuff is just going to make for more sexualism, which is the same as racialism but regarding the genders. Indeed with all the other cis and trans and queer and all the other idiotic gender classification crap this was destined to happen -- people now deathly afraid of how to consider one another gender-wise without some expert witch hunters coming down on you like a ton of bricks. A colleague brought up the reality of men simply not hiring women anymore to avoid this altogether -- now what kind of villainous sexualists will men be considered?

That racialist thing, by the way? It is the idea that anything bad that happens to you is because of racism, particularly the kind the white privileged class exert over people of color all the time, the kind those inherently malevolent whites can't help but let's make sure we punish them sufficiently for it. All the horrific confusion over how to behave sexually? That's sexualism -- women have some interminably entrenched grievance against men simply because they are men, and women have the overriding prerogative of employing it at any time for maximum victimhood virtue signaling: Men must be punished sufficiently.

Yeah, it is destroying humanity.

The things these guys -- or anyone else for that matter -- will absolutely refuse to say in their pieces are the following. Remember, they always conclude with something along the lines of, "Well, whaddya do with that? I dunno, I guess we're all toast."

Well here are the truths beyond that.

One, the reason we so rabidly manipulate whatever happens with sex and death and our fascination with it in some way or another is because of our sinfulness. The culprit is our very own charred wicked hearts. This truth is completely dismissed because so many still desperately want to give vent to their distended virtue signaling: I'm better than these people. No, the first thing that needs to be said after brilliant exposes like Hawkins' and Walsh's is I'm no better. I too have a deep-seeded desire to do sexually questionable things and challenge death in foolish ways to see if I can cheat it and get everyone to see how awesome I am.

Two, World Operatives in the employ of Cain's legacy exploit that to their advantage, indeed to expand their legitimacy in administering the ordained sin management operation of the System. That System is the federal government, the banking/finance system, and the Roman Catholic Church, all working as a monolithic iron triangle of iron triangles to keep the evildoing going real good, and then they can all spout about how splendidly they are doing at mitigating it through whatever apparatus works for that thing at that time. Are you in the mix of this body of death? Then you're being laid out on the altar of modern-day human sacrifice.

Three, the most important one of all, the only -- the only antidote to this is Jesus Christ. It isn't more reporting about it, raising awareness about it, having more conversation about it, working harder to avoid it ourselves, getting more System constrictions in place (see paragraph just above), or any of a dozen different things we believe are all wholesome and wonderful. Most of those things just keep our fascination with sex and death and virtue signaling ramped up.

No, the answer is Jesus Christ. It is giving up trying to be chaste and moderate and good on Sundays but shits on Mondays. It is giving up the pretense that you are anybody, because you're not. You're dust. But you are somebody in Jesus' eyes, and His are the only ones that count. If you read His words a bit, you'll get what authentic love really is. You'll know what it means respond with genuine repentance and enter humbly into His Kingdom, where joy and peace and freedom are eternally abundant.

Those things are so valuable that He gave His own life to pay for them for you. He so much knows how benighted your condition and your life are, that's why He died -- He loved you that much. He gives you the Kingdom and every awesome thing in it, and Him to enjoy it with.

But yeah. We waddle around in the mud of thinking we're something better than these Hollywood and Washington D.C. people when we're ultimately no better. Please, we've been doing this for millennia. For millennia. We still don't get it.

But I simply write this to you, the reader, right now, reading this right now. Really, all I can do is share this with you.

Giving it all up and turning to Christ and kneeling in His courts...

Oh that someone would tell more people about that.

Wednesday, November 01, 2017

The Great Catholicist Scribe

I happened to pick up a copy of the New York Times on Friday -- sometimes I try to get a glance at some of the things the System's top megaphone holder wants our souls to absorb. Its top scribe seems to be David Brooks, and what a fantastic propagator of all things Catholicist Nation he is.

His column on Friday was one of his best. It was a meandering scrawl full of vain platitudes, a whimpering appeal to anyone who even remotely thinks Trump is anything better than dirt, a drudging cry for us all to come back around to those splendid American values, you know, community (not Trump), and marriage and family (not Trump in any way), and faithfulness (way not Trump), and humility (REALLY not Trump), and neighborliness (eeyew SO not Trump), and (quoting Rabbi Jonathan Sacks) "a strong sense of the American narrative" (NOT TRUMP!)

Give Brooks credit, he uses all kinds of culturally imperious biblical affectations to wring out the best Catholicist sentiments from those who believe the System's version of the Kingdom is the real one. Really, much of the Times network's railings at the more religious Trump voters has always been, "Please, let us reason together. If you were a true Christian, ahem, um -- Trump? Please."

The fact is so many people are still on board with Trump -- justified or not -- precisely because they see through David Brooks and everyone who is a Times vassal. The System is not the Kingdom. Yes many Trump voters are wholehearted Catholicists, I got that, and I'm sure this is why Brooks et al continue their barrage. Maybe they'll hit their target, someone, anyone who without Christ cannot see through what the System spokeholes are assigned to do as a sworn duty.

In the best sense, however, many Americans do get at least some of how benighted the System is. Oh they follow along because they're told they must, and perhaps for good reason -- the System is there to provide a modicum of protection from the murderous world. Brooks is just a vital part of that -- it does make for fine entertainment.

There is, however, the Kingdom. Jesus reigns there, but He doesn't share his dominion with anyone else. Give up yourself and have Him, and everything worthwhile, or keep yourself as Brooks so eloquently pleads, and lose it.

Anyway, I wrote a bit more about what's going on in my latest home page piece. Just blogging a bit here to introduce it this month. Email me to talk about it, would love to hear from you.

Monday, October 09, 2017

The Delightful Nobel Prize Folly

Everyone has known how silly the Nobel Peace Prize is. It is frequently awarded to people who've been horrifically violent yet have recently announced how much less violent they will be, or to people who contribute to the enablement of others' violence by offering up mealy-mouthed "peace" language to disguise their ineptitude, or to people who've done absolutely nothing but appear as quite nobly valiant racialist crusaders, such as Barack Obama in 2009.

Such is the World System's grand institutionalized virtue signaling program.

I also pay attention to a bit of the Nobel Prize in Economics, which was awarded this morning. It too has a reputation for foolishness, probably the most notable example is the one given to Myron Scholes in 1997, the guy who helped set up the genius Black-Scholes investment formula that was the linchpin in the notorious torpedoing of Long-Term Capital Management sinking to the bottom of the financial world investments amounting to a few billion dollars.

That's nice. Everyone still thinks you could devise the algorithm, the investment formula, the derivatives-value-sensitive program for optimum returns.


Today the award was given to behavioral economist guru Richard Thaler, someone who has spent his professional career merely blithering the most elementary things about the ways that people generally behave in certain circumstances. He's always added that there are all kinds of things they do that are irrational when making decisions.

I've always wondered, ahem --

Who decides what is "irrational"?

Richard Thaler?

He seems to do so with such authority. He does so because he assumes the mantle from the attention he and uber-bureaucrat Cass Sunstein got after publishing their seminal work Nudge, all about how government should "encourage" people to make the right decision whenever they think people are being a bit too irrational. They even had a word for it, libertarian paternalism.

Get people to feel they are free to make the decision Caesar "nudges" them to make.

Insidious as all get out.

I've written some more about this in this home page piece, I invite you to look over it to discover how ugly are the scholarly precepts of the reigning behavioral economists. Here's another one. I've also written this piece about Cass Sunstein's conception of "trimming," a recommendation for public discourse straight from hell if there ever was one.

Considering everything as either "rational" or "irrational" dismisses the fact that any objective consideration of what is teleologically true or even more significantly what is fully righteous must come from a transcendent standard. It is pretty simple actually. From the 14th Psalm...

"The fool says in his heart there is no God."

You can see some of the most brilliantly ingenious folly from today's behavioral economists. And the Nobel Prize committee is all too eager to dutifully make it official.

Wednesday, September 06, 2017

The Insidious Seduction of the System's Autocrat

I came across this piece in The Federalist I found to be one of the boldest expressions of reality and charity there is. So many people out there sneer that I should not care what they do with their unconventional sexual behavior, and yet I do care.

I care because I care about people's sexual health, their physical health, especially their spiritual health. I care about those sucked into the insidiously lethal sodomist maelstrom. So yeah, that's precisely why I say what I say in my webzine and here in my blog.

I'd been reading Matt Walsh's The Unholy Trinity and he is spot-on with how the sodomist agenda is so destructive, with how those who enthusiastically tell us all we must celebrate the unconventional behaviors of openly active homosexuals, same-sex marriage participants, and transgender claimants are also so contemptibly destructive of everyone in the community in which they dwell.

The problem is the debate cannot just stop at "freedom of religion", which is where Walsh tends to stray. No, it must be about the clear and cogent argumentation that sodomist things objectively and teleologically destroy lives and souls, and that indeed when the sodomist does the work of the autocrat by trying to shove endorsement of their lethal dysfunction down our throats they are, in a real sense, forcing us to care.

I'm only blogging right now briefly because I want to introduce my latest home page piece, which gets much more into the dynamics of all this, and I also want to rigorously declare once again the answer to the lethality at every level of these conditions.

Yes, once again, it is Jesus Christ.

No, no, no, it is not the straw-man Jesus the Roman Catholic Church has propped up that make everyone repulse at the name, no, not that Jesus.

No, take a look at the real Jesus, the one whose work on the cross rescues you from all that. You, you your very soul. Take a look-see at His words in the gospel of John, read them, you'll see how it works.

Sodomist: Anything related to encouraged sexual dysfunction outside of the bounds of marriage between a committed mature adult man and committed mature adult woman.


I'd love to blog more on all this but I'm tapped out. I'm so busy with work and family fugheddabouddit. But I love being in the conversation. Visit me through the email on the webzine, would love to know what you think.

Tuesday, August 08, 2017

Who Is It You Listen To? Unless It Is God, It Will Be The Autocrat

This article appeared about the inanity happening at Google regarding a bunch of clueless Gen-X'er and Millennial genius computer people trying to get the concept of righteousness. Unless they look at it by God's Word, they'll be lost. Take a peek at what they are blithering in the posts and tweets and rants they've been bilging about.

It isn't that they don't know there is truth, it is that they think truth is what the Jesuit-managed System tells them it is. In fact there are grains of truth in those things in that Breitbart piece, but they can only respond with "Well that's just how I feel don't hurt me." Really, look -- you see it all over the page.

These are fearful, even paranoid people scared to death that they'll be found out so they can't help but proclaim "I'm the right kind of social justice warrior! Listen to MY genius thoughts about it all!" You could even see that they're so into the System's version of righteousness that they might as well be bleating "I'm not a racist I'm not a sexist I'm not a bigot please don't hurt me!" for the 4,829th time in their lives.

Even Breitbart drinks from the same contaminated water. They have some conception of what they think the right words and right beliefs and right practices are, they are just as much a part of their own groupthink as the SJW's they excoriate.

The truth: Everyone intuitively knows a conception of the truth but struggles to express it. What happens when someone is plainly not in touch with the truth, when that conception will harm someone somehow, and when it's your turn to speak? What do you say?

Do you know what to say?

And what should be done with someone who continues to say mistruths that will eventuate harm to someone? Oh they can be blacklisted. Oh it's your right to have your own little blacklist.

Oh it's even better if you can get a whole bunch of people on board with holding the blacklist firmly right there in the forefront of our craniums.

This is essentially, war.

The seasoned SJW can't fathom that, they can't fathom the truth of truth-holders and not-truth-holders having necessary conflict that should be addressed so they whine and moan and pretty much get neurotic. It's all over the Google thing.

To them it's not truth-holders and non-truth-holders, it's their view and my view and their culture and my culture and their narrative community and my narrative community and DAMN IT DIVERSITY WORKS IT DOES I STILL BELIEVE IN IT DAMN IT.

So what is truth?

Look at God's Word. It's there. You'll see it if you read it. You have to get passed the vapidity of "Well that's just a religious book."

No, it does have truth. Objective, certain, assured, real truth. Indeed it is so truthful that Jesus is literally The Truth. The awesome thing is He's also Grace, which means He's pretty cool with you not exactly knowing right now, but take His hand and He'll be happy to walk you through it.

And then, when you speak about things, you'll do it with authority and wisdom and understanding.

Or you can just continue to listen to the Autocrat, ultimately the System's General who dictates everything these people are believing and plapping about, just like everyone at Google.

Really, you can have Jesus, or you can have Google.

Here's my take on hate crimes, it is a bit more of an elaboration on these ideas.